Impact of a synoptical pattern on the state-dependent model error

Authors: Ivanov S.V., Palamarchuk Yu.O.

Year: 2009

Issue: 04

Pages: 20-29


The state-dependent error of the MM5 model for the geopotential, temperature and relative humidity fields in different synoptical patterns during a winter season over the Atlantic Ocean is considered. The evolution of the model error throughout the integration period is shown. Parts of synoptical patterns responsible for the largest model error are outlined.

Tags: geopotential; synoptic pattern; systematic and random errors; temperature and relative humidity field


  1. Иванов С.В., Паламарчук Ю.О. Оценка систематической ошибки модели ММ5 при различных схемах параметризации. – Укр. гидромет. журнал, 2007, № 2, с. 53–64.
  2. Иванов С.В., Паламарчук Ю.О. Диагноз и расчет осадков во внетропических широтах в модели ММ5. – Вестник ОГЭКУ, 2008, № 5, с. 100–111.
  3. Businger, S. et al. (2001) Extraction of geopotential height and temperature structure from profiler and rawinsonde winds. Am. Meteor. Soc., Vol. 129, pp.17291739.
  4. DelSole, T. and A. Y. Hou (1999) Empirical correction of a dynamical model. Part I: Fundamental issues. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, рр.2533–2545.
  5. Dudhia, J. A (1993) Nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests  and  simulation  of  an  Atlantic  cyclone  and  cold  Mon.Wea.Rev.,Vol.121, рp.1493–1513.
  6. Fankhauser, J.C. (1974) The derivation of consistent fields of wind and geopotential height from mesoscale rawinsonde data. Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 13, pp. 637-646.
  7. Ferrant, L., E. Klinker, A. Hollingsworth and B. Hoskins (2002) Diagnosis of systematic forecast errors dependent on flow anomalies. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, рр.1623-1640.
  8. Hagemann, S., K. Arpe, L. Bengtsson and I. Kirchner (2005) Validation of the hydrological cycle of ERA40. ERA40 Project Report Series, рр.24–42.
  9. Ivanov, S., C. Simmer, J. Palamarchuk, S. Bachner (2008) Estimation of the systematic error of precipitation and humidity in the MM5 model. Advances in Geosciences, 16, pp.97-107.
  10. Krishnamurti, T.N., K. Rajendran, T.S.V. Vijava Kumar et al. (2003) Improved skill for the anomaly correlation of geopotential heights at 500 hPa. Monthly Weather Review, 131, pp.1082–1102.
  11. Leith, C.E. (1978) Objective methods for weather prediction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 10, pp. 107–128.
  12. Lynch, P. (1985) Initialization of a barotropic limite-area model using the Laplace transform technique. Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 113, pp. 1338–1344.
  13. Ngar-Cheung Lau, Eero O. Holopainen (1984) Transient eddy forcing of the time-mean flow as identified by geopotential tendencies. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 313–328.
  14. Tanaka, H.L., Ritsuko Kanohgi and Tetsuzo Yasunari (1996) Recent abrupt intensification of the Northern Polar vortex since 1988. J. Meteor.Soc. of Japan, v.74, №5, pp.947–954.
  15. Uppala, S.M., P.W. Kållberg, A.J. Simmons,U. Andrae, V. da Costa Bechtold, M. Fiorino, J.K. Gibson, J. Haseler, A. Hernandez, G.A. Kelly, X. Li, K. Onogi, S. Saarinen, N. Sokka, R.P. Allan, E. Andersson, K. Arpe, M.A. Balmaseda, A.C.M. Beljaars, L. van de Berg, J. Bidlot, N. Bormann, S. Caires, F. Chevallier, A. Dethof, M. Dragosavac, M. Fisher, M. Fuentes, S. Hagemann, E. Hólm, B.J. Hoskins, L. Isaksen, P.A.E.M. Janssen, R. Jenne, A.P. McNally, J.-F. Mahfouf, J.-J. Morcrette, N.A. Rayner, R.W. Saunders, P. Simon., A. Sterl, K.E. Trenberth, A. Untch, D. Vasiljevic, P. Viterbo, J. Woollen (2005) The ERA–40 re-analysis. Q.J.R.Meteorol.Soc., Vol. 131, pp. 2961–3012.
  16. Wilks, D.S. (2005) Effects of stochastic parametrizations in the Lorenz ’96 system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, pp. 389–407.
Download full text (PDF)